Tenbusch, Inc.
phone: (972) 221-2304
info@tenbusch.com
One of the many advantages of the TIM System is its minimal job space requirement. The TIM System's compact jobsite footprint is independent of existing line depth, while other trenchless methods require more layout for deep lines.
Installation of 5 ft long ductile iron pipe sections in a pit 9 ft long by 9 ft wide.
Another small 9 ft long by 9 ft wide work pit. The road was never closed during this sewer replacement. The pit was small enough that the contractor was able to cover the opening with metal plates each evening.
Consistent with an overall small jobsite footprint, the TIM™ System lead equipment is designed to be received in a small pit or manhole.
|
|
The TIM™ System lead pieces easily received in a manhole.
The receiving end of a replaced line that was unusually close to a residential structure. A small receiving pit was a necessity here.
The above photo shows existing surface conditions near the receiving manhole better left undisturbed.
The lead pieces were retrieved by using the existing manhole as a receiving pit.
Using the Tenbusch Insertion Method, a 200 ft section of sewer, starting at the manhole just visible at the bottom of the picture, was replaced directly under the statue in the background. The statue was a tribute to the founder of the company. The line was replaced in 4 hours. Relocating or risking damage to the statue was out of the question.
|
|
These pictures show how traffic was uninterrupted during line replacement under a six lane street in Atlanta, GA.
TOP LEFT: shows the manhole in the middle of the road.
BOTTOM LEFT: shows TIM™ pieces received within the manhole.
RIGHT: shows the location of the receiving manhole.
|
|
These pictures show necessary staging for a TIM™ installation versus a competing trenchless method.
LEFT: shows a TIM™ installation staged off the back of a trailer.
RIGHT: shows staging necessary for a competing trenchless method.
Which scenario do you think the taxpayer would prefer ?